Monday, January 31, 2011

10 Things That The Egypt Riots Can Teach Us About What Happens When Society Breaks Down

The American Dream, 1/31/11:




[...]

#1 When society breaks down, people look for whatever weapons they can find. Over this past week, abandoned police stations throughout Egypt have been stripped of their arsenals by looters.

#2 When society breaks down, nobody is safe. Average Egyptians "armed with sticks and razors" have formed vigilante groups to protect their homes from the crazed looters that have emerged during the rioting.

#3 When society breaks down, you better protect your women and children. At least 60 rapes have been officially reported since the rioting began. The unofficial number is surely far higher than that.

#4 When society breaks down, criminals do not fear the law. There are reports that at least 4 prisons have been attacked and that thousands of convicts have escaped into the streets.

#5 When society breaks down, authoritarian governments begin hoarding food. The Telegraph is reporting that governments throughout the Middle East and North Africa have started stockpiling huge amounts of food in response to all the rioting that has been going on.

#6 When society breaks down, food shortages can happen shockingly fast. As commerce has been brought to a standstill in Egypt, serious shortages of some of the most important basic food staples are starting to be reported. Many families in Egypt only have enough food to be able to survive for a couple more days.

#7 When society breaks down, respect for personal property goes out the window. All over Egypt shops and businesses are being broken into and totally looted.

#8 When society breaks down, mobs will start doing some of the most stupid things imaginable. According to Egypt's top archaeologist, Zahi Hawass, looters broke into the Egyptian Museum during the rioting "and destroyed two pharaonic mummies".

#9 When society breaks down, it always creates a "power void". The Obama administration is calling for an "orderly transition of power" in Egypt, but there is absolutely no guarantee that is going to happen - especially in a nation that has no history of legitimate democracy.

#10 When society breaks down, often outside influences are involved. The individual being touted as the new "leader" of the protest movement in Egypt is Mohamed ElBaradei.


[...]





.

Vijay Prashad on Egypt,

as interview by Pothik Ghosh at CounterPunch, 1/31/11:




[...]

I find many parallels between Mexico and Egypt. In both, the Left was not sufficiently developed. Perils of the Right always lingered. If the Pharonic state withers, as Porfirio Diaz's state did, the peasants and the working class might move beyond spontaneity and come forward with some more structure. Spontaneity is fine, but if power is not seized effectively, counter-revolution will rise forth effectively and securely.

[...]

If such a transformation fails, which god willing it won't, then we are in for at least three options: (1) the military, under Egyptian ruling class and US pressure, will take control. This is off the cards in Tunisia for now, mainly because the second option presented itself; (2) elements of the ruling coalition are able to dissipate the crowds through a series of hasty concessions, notably the removal of the face of the autocracy (Ben Ali to Saudi Arabia). If Mubarak leaves and the reins of the Mubarakian state are handed over to the safe-keeping of one of his many bloodsoaked henchman such as Omar Suleiman…. Mubarak tried this with Ahmed Shafik, but he could as well have gone to Tantawi….all generals who are close to Mubarak and seen as safe by the ruling bloc. We shall wait to see who all among the elite will start to distance themselves from Mubarak, and try to reach out to the streets for credibility. As a last-ditch effort, the Shah of Iran put Shapour Bakhtiar as PM. That didn't work. Then the revolt spread further. If that does not work, then, (3) the US embassy will send a message to Mohamed El-Baradei, giving him their green light. El-Baradei is seen by the Muslim Brotherhood as a credible candidate. Speaking to the crowds on January 30 he said that in a few days the matter will be settled. Does this mean that he will be the new state leader, with the backing of the Muslim Brotherhood, and certainly with sections of Mubarak's clique? Will this be sufficient for the crowds? They might have to live with it. El-Baradei is a maverick, having irritated Washington at the IAEA over Iran. He will not be a pushover. On the other hand, he will probably carry on the economic policy of Mubarak. His entire agenda was for political reforms. This is along the grain of the IMF-World Bank Structural Adjustment part 2, viz., the same old privatisation agenda alongside "good governance". El-Baradei wanted good governance in Egypt. The streets want more. It will be a truce for the moment, or as Chavez said, "por ahora".

[...]



.

Burning Truth

As published on Dissident Voice, Global Research, CounterPunch and Online Journal, 1/31/11:





Vietnam rarely makes the news these days, but there was a recent item about a journalist who died after being doused in his sleep with a chemical, then set on fire. The BBC implied that he may have been retaliated against for reporting on official misconduct.

Investigating corruption and abuse of power, Hoang Hung made plenty of enemies in high places. His best known article is about how officials in Long An, after receiving bribes from developers, kicked hundreds of farmers off their lands to make way for golf courses. After his death, a colleague quoted Hoang Hung, “We’re soldiers on the media battlefield. We must dare to speak the truth, dare to fight for social justice in spite of harassment from many quarters.” Fifty years old at his death, Hoang Hung was too young to participate in the Vietnam War. His father, however, was a Vietcong who died in battle.

The Vietnamese Communists won the war so they could eventually open the country to Capitalist sweat shops and golf courses. No wonder Hoang Hung was pissed. To make room for a rich man’s game, hundreds of Vietnamese became landless. Though Vietnam is smaller than California, it has more than twice the population. The deltas and coastline are packed with people. There, even a lawn is an alien concept, and as popular as soccer is, there are few grass fields. Vietnamese grow rice and vegetables, not grass. The last thing Vietnam needs is golf courses, but of course they aren’t built for the locals.

According to George Carlin, America doesn’t need these vast, high maintenance fields either. From a 1992 skit, “It is time to reclaim the golf courses from the wealthy and turn them over to the homeless […] Think of how big a golf course is. The ball is that fucking big! What do these pinheaded pricks need with all that land? There are over 17,000 golf courses in America. They average over 150 acres apiece. That's 3 million plus acres, 4,820 square miles. You could build two Rhode Islands and a Delaware for the homeless on the land currently being wasted on this meaningless, mindless, arrogant, elitist, racist […] and a boring game.”

In any case, whoever killed Hoang Hung was a pro. The assassin knew that he tended to work late and often slept in his second floor home office. Waiting until the lights were out, the killer managed to climb onto the balcony without being detected just after midnight. He then entered the darkened room where his target was sound asleep inside the mosquito netting. After the attack, there were photos in the Vietnamese press of the scorched bed and the near-naked victim lying in the hospital, where he suffered for ten days before dying. Make no mistake about this: Hoang Hung was killed as a warning to other journalists. Make too much noise and you will be roasted alive like this man.

In the 60’s, South Vietnamese monks immolated themselves to protest against the government. Their action was effective because it was a horrendous spectacle. It was visual. At the same time, South Vietnam’s best novelist, Nhat Linh, also committed suicide in protest, but he did it by ingesting poison in private. Whereas the image of a burning monk has become iconic, Nhat Linh’s death caused no international ripple whatsoever. It wasn’t visual. There is nothing to show.

Everywhere now, not least America, writers are becoming more invisible by the day, in any case. With so much mass media all the time, it would not matter if an American writer became a living torch in Times Square. They’d just hose his ashes into the gutter and point the camera at the naked cowboy. The Vietnamese Communists have also figured out that serious writers are mostly irrelevant in this cultural climate. They used to lock up poets—one, Nguyen Chi Thien, was imprisoned for a total of twenty-seven years—but now they pretty much leave poets alone. Though many are still blocked from publishing, poets are no longer jailed. To imprison a poet is to shine a spotlight on him. No one pays attention to poets anyway, no matter what they write. From the perspective of tyranny, it would be foolish to flesh out this nothingness.

Journalists, however, are a different story. They can still reach the masses. America has solved this problem by consolidating her media outlets. With countless newspapers and TV stations, there seems to be many voices speaking, but nearly all are manipulated by the same puppet master. As everyone sits in the dark, the spotlight is fixed on a tiny ring where there’s much flailing over next to nothing. Should anyone still manages to get out of line, however, America can always snuff him out, just like the Vietnamese did. Invading Iraq, we bombed the office of Al Jazeera and shelled the Palestine Hotel, killing three journalists. We also arrested Al Jazeerra’s al Sami al-Hajj and kept him in Guantanamo for six years without charge. In 2005, an American tank shot at a car carrying Italian journalist, Giuliana Sgrena, injuring her and killing intel agent, Nicola Calipari.

On the American fringe, independent voices are free to write as they please, but even the best among them can only appear in little read webzines. Many write almost exclusively on their own blogs. Needless to say, they have almost no impact on the general public. In too late late capitalism, those who seek to tell the truth don’t need to be burnt. They are already being drown out by nonsense.



Hoang Hung's bed



.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Mohamed ElBaradei: Globalist Pied Piper Of The Egyptian Revolt

Paul Joseph Watson at Prison Planet.com, January 29, 2011:



Meet the new boss, same as the old boss: Soros and Brzezinski prepare to hijack the revolution

The revolt in Egypt is an organically driven people-power movement to oust a dictator, restore universal freedoms, and wrestle the country free from the clutches of the US military-industrial complex, but the man now being positioned to form a new government is a pied piper working for the very same globalists and NGO’s that autocrat leader Hosni Mubarak has dutifully served for nearly 30 years.

Make no mistake about it, under the current regime Egypt is a vassal state for the new world order. Under Mubarak, the country receives some $2 billion in aid every year from the United States, second only to Israel. In addition, Egypt pays out $1.1 million annually to the Podesta Group, an organization closely tied with the Obama administration, to act as “foreign agents” for Mubarak’s regime.

Mubarak’s loyalty to the US empire was reciprocated this week when Vice-President Joe Biden ludicrously asserted that Mubarak’s unbroken 30 year reign did not represent a dictatorship and that he was a close ally of the west.

“Egypt under Mubarak uses its billions in U.S. military aid to detain, beat and torture dissenters, opposition politicians and journalists; many have died in custody,” writes Mark Zepezauer. “Thousands of political prisoners and pro-democracy activists are held in overcrowded, disease-ridden prisons, without charges or trials. Press restrictions, including newspaper shutdowns, are widespread.”

Which is why it makes no sense whatsoever for the CIA to be involved in contriving a series of riots that would destabilize and threaten to topple a regime loyal to them. This is not the type of staged “color revolution” that we’ve witnessed before in places like Georgia, the Ukraine or Yugoslavia – orchestrated events disguised as spontaneous uprisings intended to remove rogue leaders hostile to the global elite’s agenda for world government.

This is a grass roots movement being carried out by impoverished young Egyptians finally standing up in unison to a regime that toadies to the west yet allows its people none of the freedoms associated with living in a modern and prosperous nation. But that doesn’t mean the revolution we currently see unfolding on the streets of Alexandria, Cairo, Suez and cannot be co-opted by the very same globalist forces who have been pulling Mubarak’s strings for the past three decades.

The US military-industrial complex has known for at least three years that Egypt was teetering on the verge of regime change, and they certainly were not going to let anyone outside parties take control after Mubarak’s fall. That’s why the American Embassy trained rebel leaders to infiltrate opposition groups from the very beginning, as the Telegraph reveals today.

[...]


.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Why Do Americans Take It in the Face?

RUSSELL MOKHIBER in CounterPunch, 1/27/11:


All throughout the Arab world, the despots are on the run.

Fueled by Facebook and Twitter, the Arab street is aflame.

In the United States, instead of fueling the resistance, social media is like a hypnotic drug.

A young Arab in Tunisia gets slapped around – the story goes – by a police officer.

He lights himself on fire.

And the whole Arab world is engaged.

Here in the United States, we get slapped around daily by the corporate elite.

And we take it sitting down in front of our computers.

Case in point.

Ronald Flanagan is a Vietnam Vet in Thornton, Colorado.

Ronald and his wife Frances have health insurance from Ceridian Cobra Services.

Their month premium – $328.69.

Frances went on line to pay their monthly premium.

By accident, she types in $328.67.

Two cents short.

Guess what our pals at Ceridian did?

Exactly.

Dropped the policy.

It came at a bad time for the Flanagans.

And a good time for Ceridian.

Ron has been fighting multiple myeloma – a cancer of the bone marrow – since September 2008.

"The nurses were just getting ready to do the biopsy when my wife popped into the office and told them, 'Stop. We don't have any insurance,'" Ron told ABC News 7 in Denver.

"And that's when they let me know that we no longer had insurance on account of the two cents, and they canceled us," Frances said. "Since then, I've been depressed. I haven't been able to hardly do anything. As you can see, we still have our Christmas decorations up. So it's been hard on me."

Because of the two-cent mistake, Ceridian Cobra Services will not pay for the procedure.

We know that Ron is not alone.

We know that 45,000 Americans die every year due to lack of health insurance.

We know a person in our community in West Virginia who was diagnosed recently with a life threatening illness.

This person was six months away from being eligible for Medicare.

This person had no health insurance.

So, this person waited until reaching Medicare eligibility – 65 – before beginning treatment.

Apparently there are thousands of Americans between 60 and 65 in this dilemma.

They wait.

And many of them die as a result.

[...]



.

The CEO as an Objective of War

John Robb from 4/22/05:



[...]

CEO kidnapping isn't new. It is common practice in Brazil, Mexico, etc. The difference in Iraq is the motive. In Iraq, it isn't purely financial gain. It is being used as a way to unravel the fledgeling Iraqi government.

Here's why. America's second largest ally in Iraq isn't the UK. Not even close. Corporations like Halliburton provide almost as many trigger pullers and engineers as the US Army. They are the battalions of foot soldiers in Thomas Barnett's sys-admin force -- connecting Iraq to the US and the world.

This role converts CEOs into generals/colonels in the US globalization machine (leaders of new entrants in the rapidly expanding long tail of warfare). They are now legitimate and highly prized targets.

The Corporate Systempunkt

The corporation is a particularly bad organization for warfare. It is much too centralized. The institution of the CEO is a particular weakness (a systempunkt in global guerrilla lingo). The CEO's network centrality makes him/her a single point of failure for the entire corporate organism. Here are some of the ways this damage can flow through a company:

  • Psychological trauma. We've already seen the results of this trauma at work on corporate decision making in Iraq. Ongoing assaults on corporate employees have caused numerous corporate withdrawals (over a large number of nationalities, which implies that corporate behavior in this regard is relatively universal). Assaults on CEOs ups the psychological ante: it pierces the flimsy veil between corporate behavior and the personal security of senior executives. The result is a greater level of risk adverse behavior within the target company and companies on the edge of involvement.
  • Financial trauma. The departure of the CEO from a public company can create substantial market volatility in the company's stock (see this Fed study for more) for up to two years after the event. NOTE: This volatility offers the incentive of rapid financial gains to guerillas with the foreknowledge of attacks through leveraged investments in options and derivatives -- remember, in this crazy new world micro-finance and warfare are closely connected.
  • Organizational trauma. The financial trauma (see above) is symptomatic of the organizational chaos a company goes through when a CEO rapidly departs. The pyramidal organizational networks of most corporations demonstrate a major vulnerability to the loss of its central decision maker. This is particularly true in a small entrepreneurial company like Equipment Express. Even after a new CEO is selected, he/she can be relied upon to change strategic plans, roil the ranks of senior management, and generally slow down decision making in the short-term.

What's Next?

Frankly, a CEO is an excellent strategic target as well as a tactical target. As a rule of thumb, I would consider all CEOs that reside/work within a nation-state at war with non-state guerrillas at risk. Under almost all measures of this new method of warfare, CEOs are better targets than government or military officials.

Remember, in this flat world, it is easy to pull up a CEO's name, address, credit history, and even a satellite photo of his/her home from a Cyber Cafe in Peshawar.





.

Thursday, January 27, 2011

Airport bans toy soldier's three-inch rifle from plane... because it's a safety threat

Daily Mail, 27th January 2011:



The crouching, camouflaged figure is most certainly armed. But few would say he was dangerous.

Security officials disagreed however when he passed through a scanner at Gatwick Airport.

His three-inch, plastic toy gun was branded a ‘firearm’ and banned from a transatlantic flight.

The plastic Royal Signaller was bought by tourist Julie Lloyd as a present to take home to her husband Ken, a recently retired policeman in Toronto, Canada.

Mrs Lloyd, 59, who regularly visits Britain to see her mother, said: ‘I took it to the airport still in its wrapping, but they discovered the little gun when it was scanned.

‘It is only about three inches long and there are no moving parts. There isn’t even a trigger.

‘But they wouldn’t let me take it with me. I had it in my hand luggage. I just didn’t think it would cause a problem. They said rules were rules. There was no flexibility or common sense.’

[...]


article-0-0CEEFE8D000005DC-94_468x632



.

from "The Doomsday Project, Deep Events, and the Shrinking of American Democracy"

Peter Dale Scott in Global Research, 1/27/11:



[...]

When Eisenhower warned against the military-industrial complex in 1961 it was still a minority element in our political economy. Today it finances and dominates both parties, and indeed is now also financing threats to both parties from the right, as well as dominating our international policy. As a result, liberal Republicans are as scarce in the Republican Party today as Goldwater Republicans were scarce in that party back in 1960.

That change has been achieved partly by money, but partly as a result of deep events like the JFK assassination, the Watergate break-in, and 9/11. As a rule, each of these deep events is attributed by our government and media to marginal outsiders, like Lee Harvey Oswald, or the nineteen alleged plane hijackers.

I have long been skeptical of these “lone nut” explanations, but recently my skepticism has advanced to another level. My research over four decades points to the conclusion that each of these deep events

1) was carried out, at least in part, by individuals in and out of government who shared and sought to promote this repressive mindset;

2) enhanced the power of the repressive mindset within the U.S. government;

3) formed another stage in a continuous narrative whose result has been a transformation of America, into a social system dominated from above, rather than governed from below.

Please note that I am talking about the result of this continuous narrative, not about its purpose. In saying that these deep events have contributed collectively to a major change in American society, I am not attributing them all to a single manipulative “secret team.” Rather I see them as flowing from the workings of repressive power itself, which (as history has shown many times) transforms both societies with surplus power and also the individuals exercising that surplus power.

We are conditioned to think that the open institutions of American governance could not possibly provide a milieu for plots like 9/11 against public order. But since World War Two covert U.S. agencies like the CIA have helped create an alternative world where power is exercised with minimal oversight, often at odds with public agencies’ proclaimed policy objectives of law and order, and often in conjunction with lawless and even criminal foreign and domestic elements.



[...]



.

Tunisia and the IMF's Diktats: How Macro-Economic Policy Triggers Worldwide Poverty and Unemployment

Michel Chossudovsky in Global Research, January 20, 2011:




General Zine el Abidine Ben Ali , the defunct and deposed president of Tunisia is heralded by the Western media, in chorus, as a dictator.

The Tunisian protest movement is casually described as the consequence of an undemocratic and authoritarian regime, which defies the norms of the "international community".

But Ben Ali was not a "dictator". Dictators decide and dictate. Ben Ali was a servant of Western economic interests, a faithful political puppet who obeyed orders, with the active support of the international community.

Foreign interference in Tunisia's domestic affairs is not mentioned in the media reports. The food price hikes were not "dictated" by the Ben Ali government. They were imposed by Wall Street and the IMF.

The role of Ben Ali's government was to enforce the IMF's deadly economic medicine, which over a period of more than twenty years has served to destabilize the national economy and impoverish the Tunisian population.

Ben Ali as head of state did not decide on anything of substance. National sovereignty was foregone. In 1987, at the height of the debt crisis, the left nationalist government of Habib Bourguiba was replaced by a new regime, firmly committed to "free market" reforms.

Macroeconomic management under the helm of the IMF was in the hands of Tunisia's external creditors. Over the last 23 years, economic and social policy in Tunisia has been dictated by the Washington Consensus.

Ben Ali stayed in power because his government obeyed and effectively enforced the diktats of the IMF, while serving the interests of both the US and the European Union.

This pattern has occurred in numerous countries.

[...]




.

The Baby Butcher, Revisited

William Saletan


Is it OK to abort a viable fetus? An answer to pro-choicers on Kermit Gosnell.

Kermit Gosnell, a Philadelphia abortionist, has been charged with butchering viable babies, causing a woman's death, and endangering other patients. A grand jury report details his alleged crimes. Last week, I cited the report as a challenge to several feminist writers who have lately asserted a woman's right to decide not only whether to have an abortion but how long she can wait to make that choice. Gosnell stands charged with abortions beyond the 24-week gestational limit prescribed by Pennsylvania law. I asked the feminist writers whether, in the name of women's autonomy, those charges should be dropped.

I haven't seen an answer to my question. Instead, I've been challenged by other pro-choice writers who see the Gosnell case very differently. They think I've misunderstood the scandal and its lessons. Fair enough. Let's look at their arguments.

1. The vast majority of abortions take place early in pregnancy. "Only 1.5% of abortions occur after 21 weeks of pregnancy," notes Vanessa Valenti at Feministing. She's right. Women and clinics deserve credit for acting earlier and keeping that number down. Still, 1.5 percent of 1.2 million abortions per year is 18,000 very late abortions. How long should the abortion decision clock be allowed to run?

[...]




.

Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Empty Promises: 5 Reasons Why Barack Obama’s State Of The Union Address Was Completely Wrong About The Economy

The Economic Collapse blog, 1/26/11:



Barack Obama's State of the Union address sure sounded good, didn't it? There were lots of solemn promises, lots of stuff about America's "bright future" and a line about how we are now facing this generation's "Sputnik moment" that will surely make headlines all over the globe. But we all knew that Barack Obama could give a good speech. That has never been the issue. What the American people really need are some very real answers to some very real problems. So were there any real answers in Barack Obama's State of the Union address? Well, Barack Obama promised that America will "out-innovate, out-educate and out-build" the rest of the world. He also pledged that America will become "the best place in the world to do business" and that the government must "take responsibility" for our deficit spending. But does all of this rhetoric mean anything or is all this just another batch of empty promises to add to the long list of empty promises that Barack Obama has already made and broken?

[...]





.

Richard Falk

on 1/11/11:


[...]

We don’t require WikiLeaks to remind us not to trust governments, even our own, and others that seem in most respects to be democratic and law-abiding. And we also by now should know that governments (ab)use their authority to treat awkward knowledge as a matter of state secrets, and criminalize those who are brave enough to believe that the citizenry needs to know the crimes that their government is committing with their trust and their tax dollars.

The arguments swirling around the 9/11 attacks are emblematic of these issues. What fuels suspicions of conspiracy is the reluctance to address the sort of awkward gaps and contradictions in the official explanations that David Ray Griffin (and other devoted scholars of high integrity) have been documenting in book after book ever since his authoritative The New Pearl Harbor in 2004 (updated in 2008). What may be more distressing than the apparent cover up is the eerie silence of the mainstream media, unwilling to acknowledge the well-evidenced doubts about the official version of the events: an al Qaeda operation with no foreknowledge by government officials. Is this silence a manifestation of fear or cooption, or part of an equally disturbing filter of self-censorship? Whatever it is, the result is the withering away of a participatory citizenry and the erosion of legitimate constitutional government. The forms persist, but the content is missing.

[...]

Let us remember that what seems most disturbing about the 9/11 controversy is the widespread aversion by government and media to the evidence that suggests, at the very least, the need for an independent investigation that proceeds with no holds barred.

Such an investigation would contrast with the official ‘9/11 Commission’ that proceeded with most holds barred.

[...]


.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

My first art notice

in about 18 years. Philadelphia's City's Best, 1/24/11:



Check Out the Winter's Best Photo Shows

Serene or shocking, photography can help us appreciate the dreamlike transparency of life's ever-shifting moments. Gear up for new shows and familiarize yourself with the current players in Philly's photo scene.

Kelly Writers House: If you like social commentary, an exhibition of work by Vietnamese transplant Linh Dinh exposes the gritty glory of city life. Philadelphians will enjoy the familiarity of the scenes, but be prepared for the documentary angle. Images that juxtapose homeless folk with speeding youngsters and advertisements for beer with AA meeting fliers will remind you that life is full of irony.

"State of the Union" by Linh Dinh on display until Feb. 18.

Kelly Writers House, 3805 Locust Walk; 215-573-9748

[...]



.

Monday, January 24, 2011

Common Dreams update

This morning, Common Dreams reposted Chris Hedges' article, "Where Liberals Go to Feel Good." Like other commentators, Hedges points out how gullible, feeble and cowardly our liberals are. While congratulating themselves on having the correct posture, they never go far enough. They are impotent and complicit.

Commenting on this, I said that what Hedges is describing sounds like what happens on Common Dreams itself. There, liberals can fret over Obama and root for the Democratic Party as the country goes to hell. I also said that their progressive calisthenics don't include outrage or sadness over the worst mass murder in U.S. history. There is nothing on there about the Kermit Gosnell case, not even a stray mention in a comment. Today, Common Dreams has an article called "Freedom of Choice: Living for What You Would Die For." This, I pointed out, is "ironic and outright creepy," considering their indifference to the killing of babies and women by a hack abortionist.

My comment provoked at least a couple of responses, one very thoughtful that agreed, yes, the Gosnell case should cause more of a national uproar. I stepped out for a few hours. When I came back, my comment has been erased! The responses to my comment have also been erased.

Common Dreams has revealed itself to be thin-skinned and completely undemocratic. Only approved opinions are allowed on there, apparently. This soft forum is where liberals go to feel good. I am both bemused and disgusted.






.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

It's quite remarkable

the lack of uproar over the Kermit Gosnell case. According to investigators, Gosnell deliberately killed hundreds of just-born, viable infants over three decades. He is the biggest mass murderer in US history, yet the main stream and even alternative media are just shrugging it off. Yesterday I sent a piece about this case to Common Dreams, which they promptly ignored. Though they tend to turn down my very best pieces, such as my articles on 9/11 and revolt, for example, I thought surely they'd run this, since they hadn't published anything on Gosnell. In fact, a search for "Kermit Gosnell" on their website turns up nothing, not even a stray mention in a comment.

A limited hang out, self congratulating forum for soft thinking Liberals, Common Dreams frets over Obama, roots for the Democratic Party and snuffs out questions about 9/11. Still, you'd think that hundreds of babies killed in the heart of a major American city warrants a discussion? If the mass murderer is an abortionist, maybe the topic is off limit to these American "progressives." And since these black babies were killed by a black doctor, there's no racism angle to exploit. What am I missing here?






.

Gulf Coast fighting for recompense

Dahr Jamail in Al Jazeera, 21 Jan 2011:



Residents and fishermen outraged as BP's compensation fund administrator denies 'loss of income' claims.


"I just got off the phone with Feinberg's people and I'm really upset," says seafood merchant Michelle Chauncey from Barataria, Louisiana.

Her business, which sells wholesale and retail crabs, has not provided her with an income since the end of May, and her home is being foreclosed.

Attorney Kenneth Feinberg's Washington-based firm, Feinberg Rozen, has been paid $850,000 a month by BP to administer a $20bn compensation fund and claims process for Gulf residents and fishermen affected by the Deepwater Horizon explosion last April.

The Gulf Coast Claims Facility (GCCF), which Feinberg manages, was set up after negotiations between BP and the Obama administration, but over recent months there has been growing concern among the Coast's residents that Feinberg is limiting compensation funds to claimants in order to decrease BP's liability.

Late last month, Feinberg told Bloomberg Television that he anticipates that about half of the $20bn fund should be enough to cover claims for economic losses.

"It remains to be seen, but I would hope that half that money would be more than enough to pay all the claims," he said.

Grade F

Chauncey is angry.

"[Kenneth] Feinberg told me personally I had a legitimate claim, and that he was going to personally look into my claim and see why I wasn't being paid," she explains, adding that one of Feinberg's colleagues gave her his personal number and promised to help.

"I told Feinberg's man that I know strippers who have gotten money. So if I took off my clothes ... and worked in a bar, I'd have been paid, but since I have a seafood business I haven't been paid.

"The really sad part is that my story is not isolated," Chauncey adds. "There are loads of us, and they are all in the same predicament as I am."

Rudy Toler from Gulfport, Mississippi is a fourth generation fisherman. He submitted 62 pages of documentation to the GCCF, but says: "My claim got denied on December 4, with about 100,000 other people."

[...]




.

Saturday, January 22, 2011

.



Gosnell's-ratings





.

We’re Number Three!

As published on Dissident Voice, CounterPunch and OpEd News, 1/24/11:





Kermit Gosnell spent more than 30 years performing illegal abortions. Many of his clients were 6, 7 or even 8 months pregnant. If babies were born alive, as they often were, he killed them by snipping their necks. He punctured women’s uteruses, left fetal bits and chunks inside them to cause sepsis and infections. He cut off little feet, placed them in jars and arrayed them on a shelf. A woman would be given labor-inducing drugs, then told to sit on a toilet to “precipitate” her baby into the shitter. A particularly large offspring plopped into the water, and was "swimming," according to a Gosnell aide, before being fished out to have its neck slitted. High on the wall outside Gosnell’s clinic, there’s a white metal silhouette of a man and woman swinging a child between them. “FAMILY PLANNING” is among the advertised services.

Gosnell is a well-known figure in Powelton Village, where his clinic is located, and Mantua, where he has a mansion on a hill, overlooking the Schuylkill River. Before opening his “baby charnel house” abortion mill, Gosnell operated the Mantua Halfway House. Even as he collected millions in government funding to rehab drug addicts, he dealt methadone. He even hired a noted artist, Joe Tiberino, to paint an anti-drug mural on the building where he sold drugs. At the Powelton clinic, Gosnell also dispensed pills illegally. Prescriptions were pre-signed, to be handed out by a 15-year-old receptionist. Hey, if Queen Victoria could push opium, and the C.I.A. ferry tons of heroin here and there, why shouldn’t this small time doctor drop a few tablets onto needy hands?

Mantua, also known as “The Bottom,” is a crime and drug ridden neighborhood. It’s curious that Gosnell, a millionaire, would buy a house there, albeit a Victorian mansion. He decorated it with oil paintings, hired Polish maids. Tall, well-educated and exercised, Gosnell belongs to a family that’s been financially comfortable for generations. The power and prestige of the black elite were undercut by racial integration, however. Your average black man could now enter a white restaurant, put his money in a white bank, open his mouth to a white dentist. Gosnell survived this sea change by selling drugs to his fellow blacks and by aborting or killing black babies. When white women entered his clinic, they were led to a cleaner area and treated with more consideration. As he explained, quite candidly, to his mixed race staff, “It’s the way of the world.”

Nearly half of all black pregnancies in America end in abortion. Whatever your politics, that should be an alarming statistic. (Worldwide, the highest rate of abortions belongs to the country of my birth, Vietnam.) A week before the Gosnell story broke, there was a news item about a Memphis high school where 90 girls were pregnant. High rates of abortions and teen pregnancies can only result in head and heart aches.

The sexual revolution coincided with better and more accessible methods of contraception, but as this sexual culture became all pervasive and entrenched, means for dealing with it responsibly have not always been available. Many poor women have no doctors, hence no birth control pills. Pregnant, they have inadequate or no prenatal care. Should they need an abortion, they must wait to come up with the cash. In Italy, home of the Catholic Church, where many nuns work in public hospitals and there’s a crucifix in every hospital room, abortions are performed for free. Why? Because they have universal healthcare.

Indicting Gosnell, the Philadelphia District Attorney stated, “Pennsylvania is not a third-world country. There were several oversight agencies that stumbled upon and should have shut down Kermit Gosnell long ago.” Casualties of his botched abortions also ended up regularly in local hospitals, yet only one doctor raised a red flag, which was ignored in any case. In short, plenty of people saw what was happening, but they were either too callous, cynical or bureaucratic to care.

If bad, corrupt and neglectful government and atrocious healthcare are signs of third-worldness, then much of the United States is already there. We’re number three! Our brand of Third World is unique, however. We have managed to become both over and under developed. Unlike teeming Third World shanty towns, our slums are desolate and nearly devoid of street activities. Even before dark, everyone is bolt, chain and padlocked inside, watching 500 channels. Poverty always means the pettiest commerce, peddling and hustling, selling stuff and service from home or on the sidewalk, but this unregulated trade exists much less in America. With the strictest zoning laws on the planet, we basically outlaw survival on the lowest rungs. You can’t just set up a two table restaurant in your kitchen, offer candies and sodas on your stoop, or walk around mumbling, “Cigarettes, cigarettes,” though our poorest do try.

Recently, I sat in a bar in West Philadelphia, not far from Gosnell’s clinic. Within three hours, three men wandered in to sell incense, sheets of a Xeroxed, quite atrocious poem and (probably fake) Sex in the City perfume. Just outside Philly, in Chester, where Martin Luther King went to college, you can see men sell body oils, incense, clothing and nominal books on the sidewalks of its abject downtown. This mode of survival will spread, so the government should leave these tenacious Americans alone. What it shouldn’t neglect to do, however, is to protect our most vulnerable—and you can’t be more helpless than a newly born infant—from predators like Kermit Gosnell.

Several days have passed since this story broke, yet there’s no uproar from the mainstream or even alternative media. This is the biggest mass murder in U.S. history. Within walking distance of downtown Philadelphia, and merely six blocks from UPenn, a $40,000 a year, Ivy League school, hundreds of babies were butchered as government officials looked the other way. With failure and depravity on so many levels, there has been no national mourning or soul searching. That in itself is a tragedy.







.

Friday, January 21, 2011

Best Fiction of 2010

Anelise Chen in THE HYDRA:



[...]

Best Book for the Irreverent History Junky

Love Like Hate by Linh Dinh (Seven Stories)

Linh Dinh has written some of the most influential and widely-taught books of poetry and prose poetry, and his novel debut is equally groundbreaking. Love Like Hate paints an intimate picture of Vietnam before and after the Fall of Saigon, when the country reunited under communist rule. Dinh follows a family through two generations and traces the trajectory of a nation through the details of domestic circumstance. Hoang Long, captain in the ARVN and imprisoned patriarch of the family, comes from a wealthy landowning clan of South Vietnam. He marries Kim Lan, the daughter of a “wannabe Frenchman.” She eventually becomes the owner of a cafe called Paris by Night, and represents the resilience of the average Vietnamese citizen caught in the middle of a war they perhaps don’t quite understand. They are the transition generation: those who are forced to radically shift deeply ingrained ideologies and loyalties and consequently reemerge believing nothing. During the time Hoang Long is in reeducation camp, Kim Lan marries a Chinese-Vietnamese (more allegorical implications) who triumphs by ousting Hoang from his own home. Kim Lan’s two children represent the polemical divide in Vietnamese youth: the daughter embraces Western culture and elopes with a rich, well-read punk-rocker, and the son marries a submissive, uneducated fishmonger from the countryside. In the end, we are left wondering if the fate and future of Vietnam are nestled somewhere in between the two poles or if it rests with the daughter, who comes into adulthood with the last words of the novel: “The next day Hoa turned 18. THE END.” The bluntness of the statement leaves an unsettling peace, one detects perhaps a note of bitter resignation. On a stylistic note, Dinh proves the age-old mantra that poets often write better prose than prose-writers.

An excerpt:

Her father was a wannabe Frenchman, or, rather, an aspiring Corsican. He had studied at Lasan Taberd, a French school in Saigon, and supposedly spoke French, although no one had ever seen him talk to a Frenchman. His conversations were sprinkled with a dozen or so French words, such as moi, toi, bon, and ecoutez.

Ecoutez! Do toi want to drop by moi house this evening?”

The only book he had ever read was a biography of Napoleon, which he kept rereading until he knew all the details of Napoleon’s life better than Napoleon himself. He was one of those people who simply assumed that whatever they happened to be thinking about had to be of immediate interest to everyone else. Looking up from his crumbling book, he would ask Kim Lan’s mother, “Did you know that Napoleon was only five foot six, only an inch taller than me?”

“Why are you always talking about that man? What has he ever done for you?”

“Did you know that Napoleon was killed by his wallpaper, which contained arsenic? Isn’t that amazing? Did you know that Napoleon only had one testicle?”

“What’s wallpaper?”

“It’s something they do in France. You wouldn’t know.”

He kept a nearly full bottle of Napoleon on the highest shelf of a glass cabinet, flanked by upside-down snifters and brushed by cobwebs dangling from the ceiling. Even an adult standing on tiptoes could not reach it. He admired the liquor’s amber glow and aroma, appreciated the bottle’s elegant shape and brown-gold label, but had no stomach for cognac itself. He began each morning with a croissant and a cafe au lait, chain smoked Gauloises, and snacked often on pate chaud. Once a week he had to have a steak au poivre or a steak tartare, which he ate while scanning his wife’s face for hints of amused disapproval. “What are you grinning at?” It also irritated him to no end that she could never tell cheese from butter. The only cheese she had ever tried was Laughing Cow, which she always enjoyed with a banana. The sight of his wife holding a banana in one hand, a wedge of Laughing Cow cheese in the other, chewing happily, always made him seethe. I’m married to a monkey, he’d think.


[...]





.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

From the grand jury report

of the Kermit Gosnell case:



Section I: Overview

This case is about a doctor who killed babies and endangered women. What we mean is that he regularly and illegally delivered live, viable, babies in the third trimester of pregnancy – and then murdered these newborns by severing their spinal cords with scissors. The medical practice by which he carried out this business was a filthy fraud in which he overdosed his patients with dangerous drugs, spread venereal disease among them with infected instruments, perforated their wombs and bowels – and, on at least two occasions, caused their deaths. Over the years, many people came to know that something was going on here. But no one put a stop to it.

Let us say right up front that we realize this case will be used by those on both sides of the abortion debate. We ourselves cover a spectrum of personal beliefs about the morality of abortion. For us as a criminal grand jury, however, the case is not about that controversy; it is about disregard of the law and disdain for the lives and health of mothers and infants. We find common ground in exposing what happened here, and in recommending measures to prevent anything like this from ever happening again.


The “Women’s Medical Society”

That was the impressive-sounding name of the clinic operated in West Philadelphia, at 38th and Lancaster, by Kermit B. Gosnell, M.D. Gosnell seemed impressive as well. A child of the neighborhood, Gosnell spent almost four decades running this clinic, giving back – so it appeared – to the community in which he continued to live and work.

But the truth was something very different, and evident to anyone who stepped inside. The clinic reeked of animal urine, courtesy of the cats that were allowed to roam (and defecate) freely. Furniture and blankets were stained with blood. Instruments were not properly sterilized. Disposable medical supplies were not disposed of; they were reused, over and over again. Medical equipment – such as the defibrillator, the EKG, the pulse oximeter, the blood pressure cuff – was generally broken; even when it worked, it wasn’t used. The emergency exit was padlocked shut. And scattered throughout, in cabinets, in the basement, in a freezer, in jars and bags and plastic jugs, were fetal remains. It was a baby charnel house.

The people who ran this sham medical practice included no doctors other than Gosnell himself, and not even a single nurse. Two of his employees had been to medical school, but neither of them were licensed physicians. They just pretended to be. Everyone called them “Doctor,” even though they, and Gosnell, knew they weren’t.

Among the rest of the staff, there was no one with any medical licensing or relevant certification at all. But that didn’t stop them from making diagnoses, performing procedures, administering drugs. Because the real business of the “Women’s Medical Society” was not health; it was profit. There were two primary parts to the operation. By day it was a prescription mill; by night an abortion mill. A constant stream of “patients” came through during business hours and, for the proper payment, left with scripts for Oxycontin and other controlled substances, for themselves and their friends. Gosnell didn’t see these “patients”; he didn’t even show up at the office during the day. He just left behind blank, pre-signed prescription pads, and had his unskilled, unauthorized workers take care of the rest. The fake prescriptions brought in hundreds of thousands of dollars a year. But this drug-selling operation is the subject of separate investigation by federal authorities. Our focus was on the other side of the business.


Murder in plain sight

With abortion, as with prescriptions, Gosnell’s approach was simple: keep volume high, expenses low – and break the law. That was his competitive edge. Pennsylvania, like other states, permits legal abortion within a regulatory framework. Physicians must, for example, provide counseling about the nature of the procedure. Minors must have parental or judicial consent. All women must wait 24 hours after first visiting the facility, in order to fully consider their decision. But Gosnell’s compliance with such requirements was casual at best. At the Women’s Medical Society, the only question that really mattered was whether you had the cash.

Too young? No problem. Didn’t want to wait? Gosnell provided same-day service. The real key to the business model, though, was this: Gosnell catered to the women who couldn’t get abortions elsewhere – because they were too pregnant. Most doctors won’t perform late second-trimester abortions, from approximately the 20th week of pregnancy, because of the risks involved. And late-term abortions after the 24th week of pregnancy are flatly illegal. But for Dr. Gosnell, they were an opportunity. The bigger the baby, the more he charged. There was one small problem. The law requires a measurement of gestational age, usually done by an ultrasound. The ultrasound film would leave documentary proof that the abortion was illegal. Gosnell’s solution was simply to fudge the measurement process. Instead of hiring proper ultrasound technicians, he “trained” the staff himself, showing them how to aim the ultrasound probe at an angle to make the fetus look smaller. If one of his workers nonetheless recorded an ultrasound measurement that was too big, it would just be redone. Invariably these second ultrasounds would come in lower. In fact, almost every time a second ultrasound was taken, the gestational age would be recorded as precisely 24.5 weeks – slightly past the statutory cutoff. Apparently Gosnell thought he would get away with abortions that were just a little illegal. In reality, of course, most of these pregnancies were considerably more advanced.

But the illegal abortion business also posed an additional dilemma. Babies that big are hard to get out. Gosnell’s approach, whenever possible, was to force full labor and delivery of premature infants on ill-informed women. The women would check in during the day, make payment, and take labor-inducing drugs. The doctor wouldn’t appear until evening, often 8:00, 9:00, or 10:00 p.m., and only then deal with any of the women who were ready to deliver. Many of them gave birth before he even got there.

By maximizing the pain and danger for his patients, he minimized the work, and cost, for himself and his staff. The policy, in effect, was labor without labor.

There remained, however, a final difficulty. When you perform late-term “abortions” by inducing labor, you get babies. Live, breathing, squirming babies. By 24 weeks, most babies born prematurely will survive if they receive appropriate medical care. But that was not what the Women’s Medical Society was about. Gosnell had a simple solution for the unwanted babies he delivered: he killed them. He didn’t call it that. He called it “ensuring fetal demise.” The way he ensured fetal demise was by sticking scissors into the back of the baby’s neck and cutting the spinal cord. He called that “snipping.”

Over the years, there were hundreds of “snippings.” Sometimes, if Gosnell was unavailable, the “snipping” was done by one of his fake doctors, or even by one of the administrative staff. But all the employees of the Women’s Medical Society knew. Everyone there acted as if it wasn’t murder at all. Most of these acts cannot be prosecuted, because Gosnell destroyed the files.

Among the relatively few cases that could be specifically documented, one was Baby Boy A. His 17-year-old mother was almost 30 weeks pregnant – seven and a half months – when labor was induced. An employee estimated his birth weight as approaching six pounds. He was breathing and moving when Dr. Gosnell severed his spine and put the body in a plastic shoebox for disposal. The doctor joked that this baby was so big he could “walk me to the bus stop.” Another, Baby Boy B, whose body was found at the clinic frozen in a one-gallon spring-water bottle, was at least 28 weeks of gestational age when he was killed. Baby C was moving and breathing for 20 minutes before an assistant came in and cut the spinal cord, just the way she had seen Gosnell do it so many times.

And these were not even the worst cases. Gosnell made little effort to hide his illegal abortion practice. But there were some, “the really big ones,” that even he was afraid to perform in front of others. These abortions were scheduled for Sundays, a day when the clinic was closed and none of the regular employees were present. Only one person was allowed to assist with these special cases – Gosnell’s wife. The files for these patients were not kept at the office; Gosnell took them home with him and disposed of them. We may never know the details of these cases. We do know, however, that, during the rest of the week, Gosnell routinely aborted and killed babies in the sixth and seventh month of pregnancy. The Sunday babies must have been bigger still.


Butcher of women

Dr. Gosnell didn’t just kill babies. He was also a deadly threat to mothers. Not every abortion could be completed by inducing labor and delivery. On these occasions, Gosnell would attempt to remove the fetus himself. The consequences were often calamitous – though that didn’t stop the doctor from trying to cover them up.

One woman, for example, was left lying in place for hours after Gosnell tore her cervix and colon while trying, unsuccessfully, to extract the fetus. Relatives who came to pick her up were refused entry into the building; they had to threaten to call the police.

They eventually found her inside, bleeding and incoherent, and transported her to the hospital, where doctors had to remove almost half a foot of her intestines.

On another occasion, Gosnell simply sent a patient home, after keeping her mother waiting for hours, without telling either of them that she still had fetal parts inside her. Gosnell insisted she was fine, even after signs of serious infection set in over the next several days. By the time her mother got her to the emergency room, she was unconscious and near death.

A nineteen-year-old girl was held for several hours after Gosnell punctured her uterus. As a result of the delay, she fell into shock from blood loss, and had to undergo a hysterectomy.

One patient went into convulsions during an abortion, fell off the procedure table, and hit her head on the floor. Gosnell wouldn’t call an ambulance, and wouldn’t let the woman’s companion leave the building so that he could call an ambulance.

Undoubtedly there were many similar incidents, but even they do not demonstrate Gosnell at his most dangerous. Day in and day out, the greatest risks came when the doctor wasn’t even there. Gosnell set up his practice to rely entirely on the untrained actions of his unqualified employees. They administered drugs to induce labor, often causing rapid and painful dilation and contractions. But Gosnell did not like it when women screamed or moaned in his clinic, so the staff was under instruction to sedate them into stupor. Of course his assistants had no idea how to manage the powerful narcotics they were using. Gosnell prepared a list of preset dosage levels to be administered in his absence. But no allowances were made for individual patient variations, or for any monitoring of vital signs. All that mattered was the money. The more you paid, the more pain relief you received. It was all completely illegal, and completely unsafe.

Only in one class of cases did Gosnell exercise any real care with these dangerous sedatives. On those rare occasions when the patient was a white woman from the suburbs, Gosnell insisted that he be consulted at every step. When an employee asked him why, he said it was “the way of the world.” Karnamaya Mongar was not one of the privileged patients. She was a 41-year-old, refugee who had recently come to the United States from a resettlement camp in Nepal. When she arrived at the clinic, Gosnell, as usual, was not there. Office workers had her sign various forms that she could not read, and then began doping her up. She received repeated unmonitored, unrecorded intravenous injections of Demerol, a sedative seldom used in recent years because of its dangers. Gosnell liked it because it was cheap.

After several hours, Mrs. Mongar simply stopped breathing. When employees finally noticed, Gosnell was called in and briefly attempted to give CPR. He couldn’t use the defibrillator (it was broken); nor did he administer emergency medications that might have restarted her heart. After further crucial delay, paramedics finally arrived, but Mrs. Mongar was probably brain dead before they were even called. In the meantime, the clinic staff hooked up machinery and rearranged her body to make it look like they had been in the midst of a routine, safe abortion procedure. Even then, there might have been some slim hope of reviving Mrs. Mongar. The paramedics were able to generate a weak pulse. But, because of the cluttered hallways and the padlocked emergency door, it took them over twenty minutes just to find a way to get her out of the building. Doctors at the hospital managed to keep her heart beating, but they never knew what they were trying to treat, because Gosnell and his staff lied about how much anesthesia they had given, and who had given it. By that point, there was no way to restore any neurological activity. Life support was removed the next day.

Karnamaya Mongar was pronounced dead.


See no evil

Pennsylvania is not a third-world country. There were several oversight agencies that stumbled upon and should have shut down Kermit Gosnell long ago. But none of them did, not even after Karnamaya Mongar’s death. In the end, Gosnell was only caught by accident, when police raided his offices to seize evidence of his illegal prescription selling. Once law enforcement agents went in, they couldn’t help noticing the disgusting conditions, the dazed patients, the discarded fetuses. That is why the complete regulatory collapse that occurred here is so inexcusable. It should have taken only one look.

[...]


Section IV:

The Intentional Killing of Viable Babies


Gosnell left dozens of damaged women in his wake. His reckless treatment left them infected, sterilized, permanently maimed, close to death, and, in at least two cases, dead. Their injuries and deaths resulted directly from Gosnell’s utter disregard for their health and safety. However, if their fate was entirely foreseeable, it was not necessarily the product of specific intent to kill. The same cannot be said of untold numbers of babies – not fetuses in the womb, but live babies, born outside their mothers – whose brief lives ended in Gosnell’s filthy facility. The doctor, or his employees acting at his direction, deliberately killed them as part of the normal course of business.

Gosnell and his staff severed the spinal cords of viable, moving, breathing babies who were born alive.

Surgical abortions in Pennsylvania, performed up to 24 weeks of gestational age, are legal. Killing living babies outside the womb is not. The neonatologist who testified before the Grand Jury defined “born alive.” According to this expert witness, the federal Born-Alive Infants Protection Act defines a human as “somebody who’s been completely expelled from the mother and has either a heartbeat, pulsating cord, or is moving.”

Pennsylvania’s Abortion Control Act defines “born alive” similarly, but adds breathing and brain wave activity as indicators of life. 18 Pa.C.S. §3203.

Gosnell’s staff testified about scores of gruesome killings of such born-alive infants carried out mainly by Gosnell, but also by employees Steve Massof, Lynda Williams, and Adrienne Moton. These killings became so routine that no one could put an exact number on them. They were considered “standard procedure.” Yet some of the slaughtered were so fully formed, so much like babies that should be dressed and taken home, that even clinic employees who were accustomed to the practice were shocked.


Baby Boy A


One such baby was a boy born in July 2008 to 17-year-old we will call “Sue.” Sue first met Gosnell at the Atlantic Women’s Medical Services, an abortion clinic in Wilmington, Delaware, where Gosnell worked one day a week. The girl was accompanied by her great aunt, who had agreed to pay for the procedure, and who testified before the Grand Jury.

After an ultrasound was performed on Sue, Gosnell told the aunt that the girl’s pregnancy was further along than she had originally told him, and that, therefore, the procedure would cost more than the $1,500 that had been agreed upon; it would now cost $2,500. (Gosnell normally charged $1,625 for 23-24 week abortions.) The aunt paid Gosnell in cash at the Delaware clinic. He inserted laminaria, gave Sue pills to begin labor, and instructed her to be at the Women’s Medical Center in Philadelphia at 9:00 the next morning.

Sue arrived with her aunt at 9:00 a.m. and did not leave the clinic until almost 11:00 that night. An ultrasound conducted by Kareema Cross recorded a gestational age of 29.4 weeks. Cross testified that the girl appeared to be seven or eight months pregnant.

Cross said that, during 13-plus hours, the girl was given a large amount of Cytotec to induce labor and delivery. Sue complained of pain and was heavily sedated. According to Cross, the girl was left to labor for hours and hours. Eventually, she gave birth to a large baby boy. Cross estimated that the baby was 18 to 19 inches long. She said he was nearly the size of her own six pound, six ounce, newborn daughter.

After the baby was expelled, Cross noticed that he was breathing, though not for long. After about 10 to 20 seconds, while the mother was asleep, “the doctor just slit the neck,” said Cross. Gosnell put the boy’s body in a shoebox. Cross described the baby as so big that his feet and arms hung out over the sides of the container. Cross said that she saw the baby move after his neck was cut, and after the doctor placed it in the shoebox.

Gosnell told her, “it’s the baby’s reflexes. It’s not really moving.”

The neonatologist testified that what Gosnell told his people was absolutely false.

If a baby moves, it is alive. Equally troubling, it feels a “tremendous amount of pain” when its spinal cord is severed. So, the fact that Baby Boy A. continued to move after his spinal cord was cut with scissors means that he did not die instantly. Maybe the cord was not completely severed. In any case, his few moments of life were spent in excruciating pain.

Cross was not the only one startled by the size and maturity of Baby Boy A.

Adrienne Moton and Ashley Baldwin, along with Cross, took photographs because they knew this was a baby that could and should have lived. Cross explained:

Q. Why did you all take a photograph of this baby?

A. Because it was big and it was wrong and we knew it. We knew something was wrong.

* * *
I’m not sure who took the picture first, but when we seen this baby, it was – it was a shock to us because I never seen a baby that big that he had done. So it was – I knew something was wrong because everything, like you can see everything, the hair, eyes, everything. And I never seen for any other procedure that he did, I never seen any like that.
The neonatologist viewed a photograph of Baby Boy A. Based on the baby’s size, hairline, muscle mass, subcutaneous tissue, well-developed scrotum, and other characteristics, the doctor opined that the boy was at least 32 weeks, if not more, in gestational age.


Baby Boy A


Gosnell simply noted the baby boy’s size by joking, as he often did after delivering a large baby. According to Cross, the doctor said: “This baby is big enough to walk around with me or walk me to the bus stop.” The doctor released Sue to go home 13 or14 hours after she arrived. Her aunt described her condition: “She was moaning. She was standing up. She was like holding her stomach, doubled over.” She remained in pain for days and could barely eat. When she developed a fever, her aunt called Gosnell. He instructed the aunt to take her temperature and asked if she was taking pain medicine he had given her – which she was.

But he did not have her come in to be checked out. And he did not suggest that she go to a hospital. When Sue started throwing up a few days later, her grandmother contacted a different doctor, who told her to get to a hospital right away.

Sue was admitted to Crozier-Chester Hospital. Doctors there found that she had a severe infection and blood clots that had travelled to her lungs. According to Kareema Cross, who spoke to the aunt, Sue almost died. The teen stayed at the hospital for a week and a half. She became extremely thin and took months to recover, according to her aunt.


Other babies killed by Gosnell and his staff

Baby Boy A was among the more memorable large babies that Gosnell killed, perhaps because of the photographs, or because his teenage mother almost died too. He was not, however, the only one. Ashley Baldwin remembered Gosnell severing the neck of a baby that cried after being born. The baby had “precipitated” when the doctor was not in the clinic. Lynda Williams placed the baby in a basin on the counter where the instruments were washed and called the doctor to come. Ashley heard the infant cry. She saw the baby move while it was on the counter.

She estimated the infant was at least 12 inches long. When Gosnell arrived at the clinic, she recalled, “he snipped the neck, and said there is nothing to worry about, and he suctioned it.”

If Gosnell was absent, his employees would kill viable babies. Ashley Baldwin saw Steve Massof slit the necks of babies that moved or breathed “five or ten” times.

Massof, repeating what he had been taught by Gosnell, told her that that it was standard procedure to cut the spine in all cases. Ashley testified:

Q. These larger babies, when Dr. Steve was there, did he ever – was he ever there when any of the larger babies precipitated?

A. Yes

Q. Babies that would move?

A. Yes.

Q. So, Dr. Steve – what would Dr. Steve do with babies that moved?

A. The same thing.

Q. The same thing. And how many time did you see Dr. Steve?

A. A lot. He told me that – don’t worry about it. They are not living. It is just a reaction.
Kareema Cross testified that, between 2005 and 2008, she saw Steve Massof sever the spinal cords of at least ten babies who were breathing and about five that were moving.

When Massof left the clinic in 2008, Lynda Williams took over the job of cutting baby’s necks when Gosnell was not there. Cross saw Williams slit the neck of a baby (“Baby C”) who had been moving and breathing for approximately twenty minutes.

Gosnell had delivered the baby and put it on a counter while he suctioned the placenta from the mother. Williams called Cross over to look at the baby because it was breathing and moving its arms when Williams pulled on them. After playing with the baby, Williams slit its neck.

When asked why Williams had killed the baby, Cross answered: Because the baby, I guess, because the baby was moving and breathing. And she see Dr. Gosnell do it so many times, I guess she felt, you know, she can do it. It’s okay.

Adrienne Moton also killed at least one baby by cutting its spinal cord. Cross testified that a woman had delivered a large baby into the toilet before Gosnell arrived at work for the night. Cross said that the baby was moving and looked like it was swimming. Moton reached into the toilet, got the baby out and cut its neck. Cross said the baby was between 10 and 15 inches long and had a head the size of a “big pancake.”

Gosnell later measured one of the baby’s feet and said that it was 24.5 weeks. Gosnell’s illegal and unorthodox practices resulted in the birth and then killing of many viable, live babies.

Killing really had to be part of Gosnell’s plan. His method for performing lateterm abortions was to induce labor and delivery of intact fetuses, and he specialized in patients who were well beyond 24 weeks. Thus, the birth of live, viable babies was a natural and predictable consequence. The subsequent slitting of spinal cords, without any consideration for the babies’ viability, was an integral part of what Gosnell’s employees called his “standard procedure.”

Steve Massof described this “standard procedure.” It required the clinic’s unequipped staff to manage a clinic full of sedated patients who were thrown into full labor, and then to “deal” with whatever precipitated, including live babies – all while the doctor was at home, or jogging, or working at a clinic in Wilmington. In particular, Massof described what Gosnell expected him to do when babies precipitated in the afternoon and evening before the doctor arrived:

A: As I mentioned earlier, Dr. Gosnell would dilate the cervix to make room for passage of the products. And with the Cytotec, softening the cervix, the outlet of the uterus, well, mother nature would take its course. Every woman is different.

Q: What would happen?

A: Well, the fetus would precipitate.

Q: What do you mean?

A: Oh, come right out, right out. Just you know, I would be called, somebody would call me and at that point what I would have to do is, I’d have to go and tend to that patient.

Q: How would you do that? What would you do?

A: As – well, my first – my first reaction would be is at that point it depended sometimes it happened in the waiting room, sometimes it happened in the bathroom because, you know, a woman would be pushing in the bathroom. Sometimes, you know, it happened everywhere in the clinic.

So what I would do is, I’d make sure that when – if the fetus precipitated, the cord was cut. Also, a standard procedure, the cervical spine was cut, as well as make sure that there wasn’t bleeding or, in other words, the placenta came down and that’s the way – we insured less blood would be lost.

Q: How often did this happen?

A: More times than I really care to remember. I would have to say every week it would happen to at least 50 percent of the patients.

Q: Fifty percent of the time?

A: Yeah, easy, easy. That – you know, and that is how, you know, and that’s what would happen.

Q: You said it was standard procedure to cut the – first to cut the umbilical cord?

A: Yes.

Q: That’s from the mother or how is that attached?

A: Well that is from the mother to the fetus.

Q: And where would it be? Would it still be – the placenta would still be in the mother’s uterus?

A: Yes.

Q: Okay.

A: Yes. And so I would cut the attachment and you know, then the cervical portion of the spine at that point. Those were the larger patients.

Q: So you said that was standard procedure. What do you mean when you say standard procedure?

A: Well, that’s – that was his standard procedure.

Q: When you say his, do you mean Gosnell?

A: Yes.

Q: Did he show you how to do that?

A: Yes, he did.

Q: When did he show you how to do that?

A: He showed me how to do that maybe 2004, sometime within a year I started working there, that is what he did during his [second-trimester] procedures.
Tina Baldwin corroborated that this was Gosnell’s standard procedure. She explained that after a fetus was expelled, Gosnell “used to go ahead and do the suction in the back of the neck.” She saw this “hundreds” of times. Gosnell told her that this was “part of the demise.”

Gosnell’s technique of aborting pregnancies by inducing labor and delivery, while unnecessarily painful for the women, did not itself constitute a crime. What made his procedure criminal was that he routinely performed these abortions past the 24-week limit prescribed by law. Not only was this a crime in itself, it also meant that he was regularly delivering babies who had a reasonable chance of survival.

Except Gosnell would not give them that chance. Pennsylvania law requires physicians to provide customary care for living babies outside the womb. Gosnell chose instead to slit their necks and store their bodies in various household containers, as if they were trash.

[...]



.

Philly's Baby Charnel House

DANA DiFILIPPO in Philadelphia Daily News, 1/20/11:




The grand jury called it "a baby charnel house."

For more than 30 years, Kermit Gosnell ran an abortion clinic in West Philadelphia that was the "go-to" place for women wanting illegal late-term abortions or for people seeking no-questions-asked prescription drugs, according to a grand jury.

Here are some highlights from the jury's report:

* Gosnell performed thousands of abortions at his Women's Medical Society at 38th Street and Lancaster Avenue, even though he was a family practitioner never certified as an obstetrician or gynecologist. Gosnell was rarely present in the clinic, allowing his unlicensed, untrained staff to administer drugs and perform procedures.

* Gosnell routinely induced labor in patients in their second and third trimesters rather than perform risky late-term abortions. That sometimes resulted in live births. He and his staffers killed the babies by stabbing their necks with scissors to sever their spinal cords and sometimes suctioning their skulls, too. About a baby writhing as he cut its neck, Gosnell joked to a staffer: "That's what you call a chicken with its head cut off."

* Gosnell is accused of murder in the November 2009 death of Karnamaya Mongar, 41, who died a day after a staffer overdosed her with sedatives. Another woman, Semika Shaw, 22, died after Gosnell punctured her uterus and sent her home. Gosnell allegedly injured "scores" of others, leaving some sterile, perforating the bowels and uteruses of others. He frequently left fetal remains inside women, who then had to seek treatment elsewhere. * Gosnell and his staffers frequently left their patients unattended, so that the dead fetuses or live babies "fell out" wherever the patient was, often the bathroom. One clinic janitor told the grand jury that this happened so often that fetuses frequently clogged the toilet.

* Conditions at the clinic were deplorable. The walls were urine-splattered, and the floors were bloodstained. A janitor testified that the bathrooms were cleaned just once a week, even though patients routinely vomited into sinks and miscarried into toilets.

* White patients waited and were treated in a cleaner room than patients of color. Patients of color who became "too rowdy" got a slap on the thigh from Gosnell, one worker testified. Gosnell photographed his patients' genitalia before procedures, another told the grand jury.

* A high-schooler, the daughter of staffer Tina Baldwin, worked in the clinic for four years, starting at age 15. She worked as much as 50 hours a week for $8.50 an hour. She routinely operated the ultrasound machine, administered anesthesia, diagnosed sexually transmitted diseases and told grand jurors she often was "in charge" of the clinic at night.

* Investigators say Gosnell made up to $15,000 a night, mostly in cash, for a few hours of work performing abortions. That doesn't include the money he made as one of the state's top Oxycontin prescribers. When authorities searched his home, they found a gun and $240,000 in cash stashed in his 12-year-old daughter's closet.

* Instead of trashing disposable medical supplies, Gosnell directed workers to reuse them over and over until they broke. They were rarely sterilized, allowing venereal disease and other germs to spread among patients. After the raid, inspectors found that the suction source used to perform abortions was the only one available to resuscitate patients.

* Medical waste and fetal remains were supposed to be picked up weekly by a licensed disposal provider. But because Gosnell didn't pay his bills, months might pass between pickups, leaving leaking bags and boxes to pile up in the clinic's basement and freezers.



.

Speaking of revolution,

consider this Time article from 3/23/1970:



[...]

In New York, there were 93 bomb explosions in 1969, police say, and another 19 bombs did not explode. Half the 93 are classed as political, a category that was virtually nonexistent ten years ago, when there were no more than 20 bombings a year. New York authorities have accused 21 Black Panthers of a conspiracy to blow up stores and railroad tracks and, during a hearing on those charges, five bombs were set off around the city in one night, three at the home of the judge. Last July through November, a series of bombs exploded in government and corporate offices in the city; three left-wing white radicals were arrested and one is still sought. The San Francisco Bay Area had an estimated 62 bombings in the past year, Seattle 33. The FBI says that there were 61 bombing and arson cases on U.S. college campuses in 1969.

Police are a prime target of black and white revolutionaries. There were two attempted bombings of police stations in Detroit earlier this month; both failed. A blast during last October's Weatherman rampage in Chicago toppled a statue commemorating policemen killed in the 1886 Haymarket Square riot and ensuing disturbances—all of which was triggered by an anarchist's bomb. While many of the attacks are clearly aimed at property and publicity rather than people, some seek to maim and murder. A bomb that ripped through the Park Precinct house near Haight-Ashbury on Feb. 16 killed a policeman when an industrial staple taped to the weapon shot through his left eye and brain.

Psychotic fads have a way of becoming contagious, and the political left has had no monopoly on bombings. Bank robbers in Danbury, Conn., recently set off three blasts to divert cops. In Detroit, rival motorcycle gangs with nary a trace of political ideology between them dynamited each other's clubhouses. In Denver, where a battle over busing for integration rages, 38 school buses were bombed last month. Three cars were recently destroyed there in separate explosions; the only link is that all were red and foreign-made.

Cops and Robbers. The most frightening aspect of the political bomb-throwing is the cool acceptance of terror as a tactic by educated people. Mainly young, often college-educated, many are guilt-ridden offspring of middle-class affluence. Others are black militants devoured by despair. What they share is an apocalyptic and conspiratorial view of society and an arrogant, elitist conviction that only they know how to reform the world. They have only a vague, romantic idea of overthrowing the "Establishment" and ending the Viet Nam War. Thus, their goals cannot be achieved through traditional means of reform within the system. As Berkeley Police Chief Bruce Baker points out, they are "playing a very tragic form of cops and robbers, seeing themselves as modern-day revolutionaries."

Some inkling of the bombers' psychology appeared in a letter mailed last week just before the New York office bombings by Revolutionary Force 9: "All three [companies bombed] profit not only from death in Viet Nam but also from American imperialism in all of the Third World. To numb Amerika to the horrors they inflict on humanity, these corporations seek to enslave us to a way of 'life' which values conspicuous consumption more than the relief of poverty, disease and starvation. In death-directed Amerika, there is only one way to a life of love and freedom: to attack and destroy the forces of death and exploitation and to build a just society —revolution."

[...]




.................
[See also my "Revolution Number Ten."]


.

Tunisia: A Digitally-Driven, Leaderless Revolution

DK Matai at Business Insider, 1/18/11:




Revolution in The Air

  • World watches nervously as protests bring down a government and force its longstanding leader into exile.

Extremely Fast Moving 21st Century Revolutionary Dynamics

1. Wikileaks exposure of corruption in Tunisia confirms public distrust >>

2. Out of control food inflation becomes an accelerant to smouldering discontent >>

3. Spark of the first few food and anti-corruption riots flickers out of control >>

4. Amplification of riots by mobile telephones, blogs, Facebook, Twitter and Youtube >>

5. Rapid evolution of self-assembling dynamic networks in streets enabled in digital space >>

6. Proliferation of food riots in different towns and cities across the county >>

7. Digital incubation and catalysis of disgruntlement over two to three weeks >>

8. Large scale mass protests erupt in capital overwhelming fears of government reprisal >>

9. Spontaneous combustion in under 48 hours >>

10. President flees and revolution gathers momentum >>


[...]


.

Amerikan Rüyası'nda çöküşe hoş geldiniz

As translated into Turkish by Onur Erem:





Halkı uyutmaya çalışan medya kuruluşları bıkmadan aynı şeyİ yineliyorlar; ekonomik toparlanma başladı, kriz geçti! Associated Press “2 yıl süren krizin ardından 2010 Noel’i Amerikalılar’a alışverişi ne kadar sevdiklerini anımsatarak ekonominin toparlanmasına katkıda bulunacak” derken Yahoo Finance da 28 Aralık sabahında “Ekonomi rayına girdi” haberini veriyordu. Ancak bu haberden bir saat sonra şu haberi geçti: “Tüketici güven endeksi aralık ayında beklenmedik bir şekilde düştü.”

Ülkede mevcut sosyal kaos, suça yönelim ve umutsuzluk atmosferi içerisinde ekonomik bir batağa saplanırken ABD yurttaşları her gün büyük dozlarda saçma haberlerle uyuşturuluyor. Buna rağmen ara sıra sokağın gerçekleri de haberlere yansıyor. Hem de Amerika’nın Sesi gibi Washington’un sözcülüğünü üstlenmiş olan bir Soğuk Savaş sembolündeki haberlere bile:

[Amerika’nın Sesi]: Noel dönemi sizin açınızdan nasıl geçiyor?

[Kasiyer]: İyi değil, idare eder diyebiliriz.

[AS]: Niye? İşler iyi değil mi?

[Kasiyer]: Hayır değil. İşsizlik çok yüksek, dolayısıyla
insanlarda alışveriş yapmak için para yok.

[AS]: Senin işin de tehlikede mi peki?

[Kasiyer]: Maalesef.

Şimdi halkın durumunu anlamak için yaşadığım yer olan Philadelphia’daki büyük bir alışveriş merkezine, the Gallery’ye ve orada çalışan insanlara bakalım. Bayan Fischel et ve peynir satan bir dükkan işletiyor. Son yıllarda satışları düzenli olarak azalmış, hâlâ da azalmaya devam ediyor. Bir de yönetimin kira fiyatlarını artırması işlerini daha da zorlaştırmış. Bu kriz döneminde fiyat artışına gidilmesinin nedeni ise alışveriş merkezinin neredeyse bomboş kalması. Üçüncü katı tamamen terk edilen, ikinci katında ise tek tük dükkan kalan Gallery’de sadece bu hafta içinde 4 mağaza kapanmış ve hiç giyim mağazası kalmamış içeride. Dükkan sayısı bu kadar azalınca yönetim de AVM’nin giderlerini karşılayabilmek için kalan dükkanların kirasını artırma yoluna gitmiş.

Fischel’in oğlu da California’da hukuk okumuş ve yeni mezun olmuş. Ancak iş bulamadığı için ailesinin yanına dönmek zorunda kalmış. Maaşı olmadığı gibi bir de öğrenim kredileri ve kredi kartı borçlarıyla uğraşmaya çalışıyor. Bu sadece ona özgü bir durum değil. 2006'da ABD’de üniversite mezunlarının üçte ikisi bir iş bulamadıkları veya buldukları işin geliri bir evin kirasını ödemeye bile yetmediği için ailelerinin yanına dönmekteydi. Günümüzde ise bu oran yüzde 85’e yükselmiş durumda.

Ali ise Pakistanlı bir göçmen. Ufak standında Çin’de üretilmiş ucuz çanta, kemer ve saat gibi aksesuvarlar satıyor. Aynı zamanda Gucci ve Coach gibi markaların da armalarını satıyor. Amerikan halkının yoksul sınıfları markalara karşı öylesine bir hayranlık besliyor ki, o markalı ürünleri alamasalar bile markanın armasını satın alıp sahip oldukları markasız ürünlere dikerek kendilerini 'seçkin' hissediyorlar.

Ali’nin ülkedeki ilk işi bir Seven Eleven dükkanındaymış. Orada biriktirdiği parayla kendine bir benzin istasyonu satın almış. Ama bütün birikimlerini Citigroup ve Fannie Mae gibi şirketlerin hisselerine yatırınca krizde her şeyini kaybetmiş. 146.000 doları battığı gibi, üstüne bir de evini kaybetmiş. Borçlarını ödeyebilmek için şu an bütün yaşamı işi olmuş durumda, lakin işten kazandığı para da her gün azalıyor. Eskiden günlük satışlar ortalama 1.500 dolar civarındayken bugün günde 500 dolarlık satış yapmak bile onu mutlu ediyormuş. Son iki yıldır zarar etmesine rağmen umudunu yitirmemiş: “Bir iki yıl içinde eşim ve çocuklarım için bir ev alabilecek hale geleceğim” diyor Ali.

Bay Giuliani ise eski bir bilgisayar tamircisi. Evlere 85 dolara bilgisayar tamiri için gidip üstüne bir de saat başı 28 dolar kazanıyormuş. Ancak patronları krizde maliyetleri düşürmek için Hindistanlı teknisyenleri tercih edince Giuliani işsiz kalmış. Şimdi saat başı 15 dolar karşılığında Gallery’de güvenlik görevlisi olarak çalışıyor.

Tren hatlarının kesişme noktasında bulunan Gallery’de son dönemde çocukların ve gençlerin gerçekleştirdiği şiddet olayları, toplumun yaşadığı çöküşe paralel olarak artmış. Çocuklar birbirlerini, mağaza sahiplerini hatta güvenlik görevlilerini bile darp etmeye başlamışlar. İşi ve parası olmayan bu gençlerin tek eğlencesi Gallery’de veya başka yerlerde kaos yaratmak olmuş. Mart ayında 73 yaşında bir adam ve 41 yaşında bir kadın 12 yaşında çocuklardan oluşan bir çete tarafından dövülerek hastanelik edilmiş. Çocuklar “Yakala ve mahvet!” adını verdikleri bu oyunu oynarken Belinda Moore’u kendilerine kurban seçmişler. “Kel orospu!” diye bağırdıkları Moore’u “Döv! döv!” tezahüratlarıyla dövüp çantasını çalmışlar. Mağdur olan Moore, Philadelphia Daily News’e yaptığı açıklamada “Bu çocuklar toplumdan mı yoksa yaşamın kendisinden mi nefret ediyorlar bilmiyorum ama bir insana nasıl böyle davranabiliyorlar anlayabilmiş değilim. Henüz 11-12 yaşlarındaki ufacık çocuklarda böylesine bir nefret nasıl oluşabilir?” demiş. Yine aynı yerde 18 yaşındaki bir başka genç de MySpace’deki blog’una “Çok sıkıldım” yazdıktan sonra 68 yaşındaki bir kadını kızartma tavasıyla öldürüp arabasını çalmış. Bu olayın ardından önce blog’una ağzında paralarla fotoğrafını koyup “Arkadaşımla şehir merkezine gidioruz, ağzıma biraz daha para koyun!” diye yazmış, ardından da “Yeni sipariş verdiğim siyah botlarım gelmek üzere!” demiş.

Giuliani’ye dönecek olursak, evi ailesinden kaldığı için bir mortgage borcu bulunmuyor. Fakat emlak vergisi ödeyemeyeceği seviyelere ulaşmış durumda. Çocukluğu bu evde geçmiş olduğu için evini pek satmak istemiyor, ama yakında satmak zorunda da kalabilir. Üstelik 10 odalı evin ısıtma masrafı çok yüksek olduğu için evi çok ucuza elden çıkarması da gerekebilir.

Gallery, daha çok müşteri çekmek için banliyö trenleri ve metro hatlarının tam kesişme noktasına yapılmıştı, ancak bu hatlar artık daha çok müşteri değil daha çok evsizin buraya gelmesine vesile oluyor. Buradaki dolambaçlı, labirenti andıran tasarım evsizler için bir sığınak görevi görüyor. Bu evsizler Giuliani gibileri tarafından kovulmadan önce binanın içinde amaçsızca dolaşıyorlar. Utanmaz Amerikan medyası köpeklerin bile bu Noel’de daha kendilerine alınan pahalı oyuncaklar sayesinde ekonomik toparlanmanın farkına vardığını söylerken, Gallery’de tekerlekli sandalyelerinde pinekleyen, mağaza köşelerine kıvrılıp uyuyan, veya çöplerde yiyecek bir şeyler arayan bu evsizler nedense(!) ekonomideki tam gaz büyümeyi fark edememişler.

'Çöküş' televizyonlarda gösterilmeyecek. Dışlanmış ve yalnız olarak hepimiz bunu bir başımıza yaşayacağız. Birer kusur olarak görülüp suçlanacağeFDz, Amerikan Rüyası fotoğrafından fotoshoplanacağız. Dibe battıkça daha da görünmez hale getirileceğiz. Gerçek ile yayınlananlar arasındaki kopuş her geçen gün daha da iğrençleşecek.





[Original]



.

Followers

Bouncer, Janus, Bellhop